A Window In Thrums by James Matthew Barrie
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER I THE HOUSE ON THE BRAE
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER II ON THE TRACK OF THE MINISTER
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER III PREPARING TO RECEIVE COMPANY
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER IV WAITING FOR THE DOCTOR
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER V A HUMORIST ON HIS CALLING
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER VI DEAD THIS TWENTY YEARS
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER VII THE STATEMENT OF TIBBIE BIRSE
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER VIII A CLOAK WITH BEADS
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER IX THE POWER OF BEAUTY
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER X A MAGNUM OPUS
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XI THE GHOST CRADLE
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XII THE TRAGEDY OF A WIFE
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XIII MAKING THE BEST OF IT
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XIV VISITORS AT THE MANSE
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XV HOW GAVIN BIRSE PUT IT TO MAG LOWNIE
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XVI THE SON FROM LONDON
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XVII A HOME FOR GENIUSES
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XVIII LEEBY AND JAMIE
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XIX A TALE OF A GLOVE
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XX THE LAST NIGHT
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XXI JESS LEFT ALONE
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XXII JAMIE’S HOME-COMING
A WINDOW IN THRUMS CHAPTER XII THE TRAGEDY OF A WIFE
Were Jess still alive to tell the life-story of Sam’l Fletcher and his wife, you could not hear it and sit still. The ghost cradle is but a page from the black history of a woman who married, to be blotted out from that hour. One case of the kind I myself have known, of a woman so good mated to a man so selfish that I cannot think of her even now with a steady mouth. Hers was the tragedy of living on, more mournful than the tragedy that kills. In Thrums the weavers spoke of “lousing” from their looms, removing the chains, and there is something woeful in that. But pity poor Nanny Coutts, who took her chains to bed with her.
Nanny was buried a month or more before I came to the house on the brae, and even in Thrums the dead are seldom remembered for so long a time as that. But it was only after Sanders was left alone that we learned what a woman she had been, and how basely we had wronged her. She was an angel, Sanders went about whining when he had no longer a woman to ill-treat. He had this sentimental way with him, but it lost its effect after we knew the man.
“A deevil couldna hae deserved waur treatment,” Tammas Haggart said to him; “gang oot o’ my sicht, man.”
“I’ll blame mysel till I die,” Jess said, with tears in her eyes, “for no understandin’ puir Nanny better.”
So Nanny got sympathy at last, but not until her forgiving soul had left her tortured body. There was many a kindly heart in Thrums that would have gone out to her in her lifetime, but we could not have loved her without upbraiding him, and she would not buy sympathy at the price. What a little story it is, and how few words are required to tell it! He was a bad husband to her, and she kept it secret. That is Nanny’s life summed up. It is all that was left behind when her coffin went down the brae. Did she love him to the end, or was she only doing what she thought her duty? It is not for me even to guess. A good woman who suffers is altogether beyond man’s reckoning. To such heights of self-sacrifice we cannot rise. It crushes us; it ought to crush us on to our knees. For us who saw Nanny, infirm, shrunken, and so weary, yet a type of the noblest womanhood, suffering for years, and misunderstood her to the end, what expiation can there be? I do not want to storm at the man who made her life so burdensome. Too many years have passed for that, nor would Nanny take it kindly if I called her man names.
Sanders worked little after his marriage. He had a sore back, he said, which became a torture if he leant forward at his loom. What truth there was in this I cannot say, but not every weaver in Thrums could “louse” when his back grew sore. Nanny went to the loom in his place, filling as well as weaving, and he walked about, dressed better than the common, and with cheerful words for those who had time to listen. Nanny got no approval even for doing his work as well as her own, for they were understood to have money, and Sanders let us think her merely greedy. We drifted into his opinions.
Had Jess been one of those who could go about, she would, I think, have read Nanny better than the rest of us, for her intellect was bright, and always led her straight to her neighbours’ hearts. But Nanny visited no one, and so Jess only knew her by hearsay. Nanny’s standoffishness, as it was called, was not a popular virtue, and she was blamed still more for trying to keep her husband out of other people’s houses. He was so frank and full of gossip, and she was so reserved. He would go everywhere, and she nowhere. He had been known to ask neighbours to tea, and she had shown that she wanted them away, or even begged them not to come. We were not accustomed to go behind the face of a thing, and so we set down Nanny’s inhospitality to churlishness or greed. Only after her death, when other women had to attend him, did we get to know what a tyrant Sanders was at his own hearth. The ambition of Nanny’s life was that we should never know it, that we should continue extolling him, and say what we chose about herself. She knew that if we went much about the house and saw how he treated her, Sanders would cease to be a respected man in Thrums.
So neat in his dress was Sanders, that he was seldom seen abroad in corduroys. His blue bonnet for everyday wear was such as even well-to-do farmers only wore at fair-time, and it was said that he had a handkerchief for every day in the week. Jess often held him up to Hendry as a model of courtesy and polite manners.
“Him an’ Nanny’s no weel matched,” she used to say, “for he has grand ideas, an’ she’s o’ the commonest. It maun be a richt trial to a man wi’ his fine tastes to hae a wife ‘at’s wrapper’s never even on, an’ wha doesna wash her mutch aince in a month.”
It is true that Nanny was a slattern, but only because she married into slavery. She was kept so busy washing and ironing for Sanders that she ceased to care how she looked herself. What did it matter whether her mutch was clean? Weaving and washing and cooking, doing the work of a breadwinner as well as of a housewife, hers was soon a body prematurely old, on which no wrapper would sit becomingly. Before her face, Sanders would hint that her slovenly ways and dress tried him sorely, and in company at least she only bowed her head. We were given to respecting those who worked hard, but Nanny, we thought, was a woman of means, and Sanders let us call her a miser. He was always anxious, he said, to be generous, but Nanny would not let him assist a starving child. They had really not a penny beyond what Nanny earned at the loom, and now we know how Sanders shook her if she did not earn enough. His vanity was responsible for the story about her wealth, and she would not have us think him vain.
Because she did so much, we said that she was as strong as a cart-horse. The doctor who attended her during the last week of her life discovered that she had never been well. Yet we had often wondered at her letting Sanders pit his own potatoes when he was so unable.
“Them ‘at’s strong, ye see,” Sanders explained, “doesna ken what illness is, an’ so it’s nat’ral they shouldna sympathize wi’ onweel fowk. Ay, I’m rale thankfu’ ‘at Nanny keeps her health. I often envy her.”
These were considered creditable sentiments, and so they might have been had Nanny uttered them. Thus easily Saunders built up a reputation for never complaining. I know now that he was a hard and cruel man who should have married a shrew; but while Nanny lived I thought he had a beautiful nature. Many a time I have spoken with him at Hendry’s gate, and felt the better of his heartiness.
“I mauna complain,” he always said; “na, we maun juist fecht awa.”
Little, indeed, had he to complain of, and little did he fight away.
Sanders went twice to church every Sabbath, and thrice when he got the chance. There was no man who joined so lustily in the singing or looked straighter at the minister during the prayer. I have heard the minister say that Sanders’s constant attendance was an encouragement and a help to him. Nanny had been a great church-goer when she was a maiden, but after her marriage she only went in the afternoons, and a time came when she ceased altogether to attend. The minister admonished her many times, telling her, among other things, that her irreligious ways were a distress to her husband. She never replied that she could not go to church in the forenoon because Sanders insisted on a hot meal being waiting him when the service ended. But it was true that Sanders, for appearance’s sake, would have had her go to church in the afternoons. It is now believed that on this point alone did she refuse to do as she was bidden. Nanny was very far from perfect, and the reason she forsook the kirk utterly was because she had no Sabbath clothes.
She died as she had lived, saying not a word when the minister, thinking it his duty, drew a cruel comparison between her life and her husband’s.
“I got my first glimpse into the real state of affairs in that house,” the doctor told me one night on the brae, “the day before she died ‘You’re sure there’s no hope for me?’ she asked wistfully, and when I had to tell the truth she sank back on the pillow with a look of joy.”
Nanny died with a lie on her lips. “Ay,” she said, “Sanders has been a guid man to me.”